Date
: 09.05.2018
To
Thiru. M.A. Siddique,
IAS One Man Committee
(Rectification of Pay Anomalies) and
Secretary to Government (Expenditure)
Finance Department Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009
Respected Sir,
Subject: Tamil Nadu Revised Pay Rules - 2017 - Rectification of Pay
anomalies -
Constitution of One Man Committee by the Government - Representation Pay anomalies during fixation of scales of pay under Revised pay Commission in 2006 and Pay scales fixedLunder the Revised Pay Rules 2017 to the post of District Revenue Officer – and other Subordinate
Officers - Grievances - Redressal-Requested.
Reference:
1. G.O. Ms.:No: 234/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated:01.06.2009.
2. G.O. Ms.No.:448,449,450/ Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated 31.12.2010 and G.O. Ms.No.:300/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated: 26.08.2010.
3. G.0.Ms.No.:71/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 26.02.2011.
4. G.O. Ms.No.: 242/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 22.07.2013.
5. Chennai Hon'ble High Court W.A. Nos.: 504, 505,514 and 2011Dt: 27.02.2014.
6. G.O.Ms.No.:303/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 11.10.2017.
7. G.O.Ms.No.:313/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 25.10.2017.
8. G.0.Ms.No.:57/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 19.02.2018.
9. G.O.Ms.No.:328/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 31.10.2017.
2. G.O. Ms.No.:448,449,450/ Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated 31.12.2010 and G.O. Ms.No.:300/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated: 26.08.2010.
3. G.0.Ms.No.:71/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 26.02.2011.
4. G.O. Ms.No.: 242/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 22.07.2013.
5. Chennai Hon'ble High Court W.A. Nos.: 504, 505,514 and 2011Dt: 27.02.2014.
6. G.O.Ms.No.:303/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 11.10.2017.
7. G.O.Ms.No.:313/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 25.10.2017.
8. G.0.Ms.No.:57/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 19.02.2018.
9. G.O.Ms.No.:328/Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./Dated 31.10.2017.
First of all our bestow our sincere and
heartful thanks to the benign Government of Tamil Nadu for the constitution of One Man Committee towards rectification of pay anomalies on Revision of Pay 2017. We the District Revenue Officers
(Retd.), warmly welcome the One man committee and its Chairman, as Trust worthy
Officer to safeguard our interest.
We humbly,
submit our redressable grievances sprout during the Pay Commission Revision
2006 and spread during the Pay Commission Revision 2017 as follows for kind
consideration and justifiable recommendation to the Government for
rectification of anomalies.
We wish to
state that in the G.O 1st cited, the revision of pay scales
was fixed to the posts of District
Revenue Officer and Joint Directors of Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal
Husbandry, Fisheries and Health from Rs.l2000-375- 16000 to the new scale of
Pay Rs.15600-39100+ Grade Pay of Rs.7600. on par with the 5 pay commissions
already announced by Govt.
The pay scales of the said Joint Directors only upgraded on
recommendations of One Man Commission,
headed by Thiru. Rajiv Rajan, IAS and fixed to the revised scale of Rs.37400-67000+Grade Pay of Rs.8700 from
previous fixation in the Time scale of Rs.Rs.15600-31900+Grade Pay of Rs.7600 in the G.O. Ms.No.:300 and 448/
Finance (PC) Dept, Dated 26.08.2010 and 31.12.2010 respectively suomoto, But in
the upgradation of the pay scale, the
category of District Revenue Officer alone was not considered although
proper representations were made saying that
Joint Directors were technically qualified persons.
On
our further representations to the Government in this regard to upgrade our post to consider and refix the
revision of pay scales to Rs.37400- 67000+Grade pay of Rs.8700 as was done in the case of the above said Joint Directors, the Government ordered in their
G.0.Ms.No.:71 /Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated: 26.02.2011, that the pay hike
ordered to the above said Joint Directors was down graded to the pay scale of Rs.15600-39100+Grade pay of Rs.7600 by specifically stating in
para 6 of the said G.O. that the down gradation was done after careful consideration, examining the extra ordinary
situation prevailing among the Officers holding identical posts of other
departments carrying same pay structure
as on 01.01.2006.
"-
Further G.O:
Ms.: No.: 242/ Finance (PC) Dept./ Dated 22.07.2013 issued by the Govt. was
also not in favour of the said Joint Directors.
Aggrieved by G.O.Ms.No.:71/ Finance (Pay
Cell) Dept./ Dated 26.02.2011 and.G.O.Ms.No.:242/ Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated 22.07.2013, the above said Joint Directors moved the Hon'ble High
Court and obtained stay. Therefore right from 31.12.2010, they are getting the
enhanced pay scale of Rs.37400-67000+Grade pay of Rs.8700 and the retired Joint
Directors of the above departments (the pensioners) are also getting 50% of the said enhanced pay scale as pension.
The writ
appeals in W.A.nos 504 of 2012 along with batch of cases filed by the said
Joint Directors (appellants) were disposed of on 27.02.2014. The Hon'ble
Division Bench of the High Court directed the Government to
constitute a Pay Grievance Redressal Committee and also ordered that the
pay hike of the appellants (Joint
Directors) shall continue till orders are
passed afresh by the Government
on recommendation of Pay Grievance Redressal Cell to be formed. The Government
have gone on appeal (SLP) before the Supreme Court, New Delhi, which are still pending disposal.
We, therefore,
submit that the grievance of the District Revenue Officers are still continue
even after several representations made earlier
before the committees and the Government. Thesaid Joint Directors who were getting equal basic pay prior to 2006 are
still getting enhanced basic pay of RS.37400-
67000+G.P of Rs.8700 siting the court orders.
It is needless to point out that
the post of District Revenue Officers
is no way inferior to the posts of
Joint Directors on the other hand it carries higher responsibilities and
coordination in the District Administration upgradation of pay scale to one set
of officers leaving a single eategory (District Revenue Officers) of officers
who were all in the same scale of pay
prior to 2006. Therefore, the Pay Commission is not justifiable in fixation of pay scale to District Revenue Officers.
Government ought to have considered this at the time of refixation as proper
representations were made by the
District Revenue Officers at appropriate times. The chance of rectification at
the Pay Commission 2017 was not availed of by Government duly citing the W.Ps
and W.As. pending before the courts.
The Government
in their G.O.Ms.No.:200/ Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated 10.07.2015 have issued
orders that the requests already made by the pay affected officers on anomalies
caused in the pay revision 2006 will
be taken up for examination at the
time of giving effect of 7th Pay Commission by Constituting Commission.
We have also
submitted our pathetic representations before the Chairman of the Official
Committee constituted for 7th Pay Commission as per the
G.O.Ms.No.:40/ Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated 22.02.2017 to get redressal on
our issues. But without considering our grievances, the Government have issued
orders in G.O.Ms.No.:303/ Finance (Pay Cell) Dept./ Dated 11.10.2017.
Therefore, the
pay scale of the District Revenue Officers have been fixed as per the Pay
Commission 2017 by taking into account of the low pay scale of
Rs.15600-31900+GP Rs.7600. Whereas, our equal Cadre officers i.e. Joint
Directors of the said departments
have been directed to opt for their fixation of pay either to get continuing
the existing hike pay of Pay Revision 2006 or to fix the new pay on the hike
pay under 7th pay commission as per G.O.Ms.No.:328/ Finance (Pay Cell)
Dept./ Dated 31.07.2017.
The Pensioners
of the above Joint Directorsalso continue to get 50% of the enhanced pay fixedunder 7th
pay
commission.
Further we wish to bring to the kind
noticeof theOne Man Committee that the error / mistake occurred in the
fixation of the review pay for the District reve officer is in service
and pre retire of 2016. During the 7th pay commission announced in
GO No 303 Finance ( Paycell)Dept dated. 11.10.2017.
While implementing the recommendation
of seventh central pay commission and
the official committee – 2017 on revision of pay
by the central and state governments the revised pay of the central
government employees in the cadre of District Revenue officers) and the District Revenue officers have been
fixed @ Rs.78,800 /- and Rs.61,900/- Respectively as follows:-
Cadre
|
Minimum pay as on 1-1
2006
|
Minimum pay taken into account for arriving
at the
revised pay
|
Multiplication factor
|
Revised Pay
|
Central government
emloyees (in the
cadre of District
Revence of taken
|
Rs.29,920/-
|
Rs29,500/-
|
2.67
|
Rs 78,800/-
|
District Revenue
officer ( State)
|
Rs.29,920/-
|
Rs.23,200/-
|
2.57
|
Rs.61,900/-
|
V 

Minimum of
pay in the pre review pay scale as on
1-1-2006 Rs.12000 x 1.86 Time
=Rs.22320/- + Grade pay of Rs.7600 /-= Rs.29,920 – Rs. 420



= Rs.29500/-
V Minimum of pays in the pay
Band
3 = Rs.15600/- plus Grade pay of
Rs.7600/- = Rs.23200/-
The Central Govt have
rightly fixed the revised pay of the Central Government employees of Rs.78800/-
by taking in to account the minimum
pay ason 01.01.2006 is Rs.29500/- ( Instead of
Rs.29920/- Difference is only
meager one) whereas the Tamilnadu
government has fixed the review pay
of the District Revenue Officer @ Rs 61900/- intentionally takes into account
the minimum pay as on 1.1.2006 as Rs
23200/- instead of Rs.29920/-
Hence the revised pay of the District Revenue Officers @
Rs.61,900/- intentionally likeup into account the minimum pay as on 01.01.2006 as Rs.23200/- instead
of Rs.29920/-
Hence the revises pay of the District
Revenue Officer should have been fixed at Rs,78000/- instead of Rs.61900/- on
par with the central govt employees (in the Cadre of District
Revenue Officer)
To support our claim, the government
in its letter No.5047/A/PC-2/2018- 1 Finance (pay cell) Dept dated 01.03.2018 has informed that the initial pay (or) minimum pay of scale pay band 3 – in the pre – revisefd scale of Rs.
12000 – 375-16500/- is Rs. 29920/- So we deserves for this claim.
We therefore request that based on
the above the minimum pay of the District Revenue Officer as on 01.01.2006 was
actually Rs.29920/- & not Rs.23200/- as adopted by the Tamilnadu Government
for fixing the pay of the District Revenue officers as on 01.01.2016 and render
justice and fix the revised pay of the District Revenue Officers @ Rs.78800/-
(Minimum pay as on 01.01.2006 Rs.29920/- x Rs 2.6 7 times = Rs.78000/- W.e.f.
01.01.2016 on par with the central govt employees.
If order is passed on such line
explined above we the the Retired District Renewal Officer may get remedy by
getting up enhanced pension, on the hike pay.
Further, the Tamilnadu Government in
his GO M.S. No.313 Finance (Pay cell) Department dt.25.10.2017 revised pension
to their pensioners by raising2.57 times
of their pension drawn last but not following pay matrix system adapter for their serving government
employees. The Central Govt has also
fixed Revised Scale of Pay by adoptedpaymatrix for both serving and retiring employees, taken into account the
pay drawn from 01.01.1986 to 31.12.1995, 01.01.1996 to 31.12.2005, 01.01.2006
to 31.12.2015 and Corresponding
pay as on 01.01.2016 for there employees.
So we request the Secretary may kindly look into this
anamoly in between serving employees pensioners and fix
the pension for pensioners by adopting pay matrix system, as done in the Central by commission (Vide Govt of India letter F.No 38/37/2016 P&PW(A)
Ministry of personal P.G& Pensioners
Department of Pension & Pensioners welfare New Delhi) TAHSILDARS: The Tasildars in Revenue Dept&
Section Officer in the Secretriat of Government of Tamilnadu are equal stateof officers & drawing equal pay scale of Rs. 6500 – 200 – 10500 as per GOMS No 162/Finance (Pay cell) Dept dt.13.04.1998. But now the difference of pay of
Rs.18,400/- is now prevailing in between Tahsildars& Section Officer as per
new 7thpay commission we request this may also considered & pass
orders. (Statement enclosed in AnnexureI) for reference.
A comparative statement of minimum
pay fixation as on 01.01.2006 and as on 01.01.2016 for the posts in Revenue
Department Dy-Tahsildar, Tahsildar Deputy Collector and District Revenue
Officers inTamilnadu Revenue subordinate of service
and civil service and distinctly furnished in (Annex II) and civil service are
distinctly furnished in (Annexure IIand III) for
one Man Committees perusal for appropriate orders.
OTHER ALLOWANCES :-
Further we request the One Man
Committee to recommend to the government of Tamilnadu to sanction 7th
Pay Commission arrears of pay and allowances for the period from 01.01.2016 to
30.09.2017 (for 21 months ) for their employees and pensioners, as granted by
the Central Government.
We request the one man committee to recommend to Government
to grant the Medical
Allowances from Rs.300 to Rs.1000 for their employees and pensioners, as
granted by the Central Government.
Finally we request our esteemed
Chairman, OMC & Secretary may kindly look into above anomalies
explained above of the 7th pay
commission &render justice to the Tamilnadu Employees and Pensioners.We pray early
orders.
Thanking You,
Yours Faithfully
(J.RAGHAVAN)
General Secretary State President
Sd -/- xxxxxxx
(A.Paramarthalingam)
Yours Faithfully
(J.RAGHAVAN)
General Secretary State President
Sd -/- xxxxxxx
(A.Paramarthalingam)
ANNEXURE
I
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF PAY SCALES FIXATION 01
i.
TAHSILDARS
IN THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT VERSUS
SECTION OFFICERS IN THE TAMIL NADU SECRETARIAT
1.
|
Tahsildars
|
Section Officer
|
Rs.6500-
200 -10500
(G.O.Ms.No.l62/Fin.(PC) Dept./
Dated 13-4-1998)
No change
|
6500-200-11100
(G.O.Ms. No.l62/Fin.(PC) Dept./
Dated 13-4-1998)
|
|
2.
|
No change
|
Rs.8000-275-13500
(G.O.Ms.No.5H2/Fin./(PC)
Dept / Dated 12 i 2 2017 on par with their counterparts in
Government of India)
|
3.
|
Rs.9300 - 34800 + Grade Pay 4900 in
Pay Band 2
|
Rs.15600 - 39100 + Grade Pay
|
(G.O.Ms.No.234/Fin.(PC)
Dept./
|
5400 in Pay Band3
|
|
dtl-6-2009
with effect from 12-12-2007)
|
(G.O.Ms.No.234/Fin.(PC)
|
|
Dept./dt.1-6-2009
with effect
|
||
from 12-12-2007)
|
||
4.
|
Rs.15600
- 39100 + Grade Pay 5100 in Pay Band 3
(G.O.Ms.No.71/Fin.(PC) Dept./
dt.26-2-2011 with notional effect from
12-12-2007
& with monetary benefit from 1-3-2011)
|
No change
|
5.
|
Rs.9300
- 34800 + Grade Pay 5100 in
Pay Band 2 (G.O.Ms.No.242/Fin.(PC)
Dept./dt.22-7-2013 with monetary benefit from 1-4-2013
|
No change
|
6.
|
Minimum pay fixed at Rs.37,700/-
(Vide Page 22 in G.O.Ms.No.303 Fin.(PC) Dept dt 11-10-2017)
|
Minimum pay fixed at
Rs.56,100/-
(Vide Page 23 in G.O.Ms.No.303 Fin.(PC)
Dept.--dt.ll-lO-2O17) Difference
Rs.18400/
|
Note:
From "ZERO" difference in minimum pay for both officials in the vear
1998 to
adisquietingiy big difference
of Rs. 18,400/ a
minimum
pay between them in the year 2017
COMPARITIVE
STATEMENT OF MINIMUM PAYHXATION AS ON 01.01.2006 AND AS ON 01.01.2016 FOR THE
POST IN REVENUE DEPARTMENT - J*OR STAFF JN TAMIL NADU [\WWFF5F3y5ffe SSR^Og,
REVENUE SUBBORDINATE SERVICE
AND CIVIL SERVICE AND ARESEPERATELY AND DISTINCTLY FURNISHED.
Sl.No
|
Designation
|
Present
Level (As per G.O 303 Fin.Dt.
11.10.2017)
|
Pay
as on
G.O.234
Fin.Dt. 01.06.2009) (Rs)
|
Minimum
Pay fixed as on 01.01.2006
including
Grade Pay (Rs.)
|
Multiplication
Factor to be applied on 01.01.2016 as
accepted by
the Govt
|
Minimum Pay to be fixed on Coimn 5 X MF (Rs.)
|
minimum Pay now
fixed as on 01.01.2016 Pay in
Pay Band + GP = Total X MF (Rs,)
|
Difference in Minimum pay (Rs)
|
|||||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|||||||||
TAMILNADU REVENUE SUBORDINATE SERVICE
|
|||||||||||||||||
1.
|
Deputy
Tahsildar
|
18
|
Table
5500x1.86
10230
|
10230+4800
=15030
|
2.52
|
15030x2.62+
Revised PP 39378 or 9640+
1300= 40700
|
14100 x2.62 =
36942 or 36900
|
40700-
36900=3800
|
|||||||||
2
|
Tahsildar
|
20
|
Table
6500x1.86
12090
|
12090+5100
=17190
|
2.52
|
17190x2.62=
45037 (or) 45000
|
9300+5100
37728 (or) 37700
|
45000-37700=
7300 (lesser)
|
|||||||||
TAMILNADU CIVIL SERVICE
|
|||||||||||||||||
3.
|
Deputy
Collector
|
22
|
Table
22 8000x1.86
=14880
|
14880+5400=20280
(or) Minimum 21000
|
2.67
|
56100
|
15600+5400=
23200x2367=56100
|
No Change
|
|||||||||
4.
|
District
Revenue Officer
|
26
|
Table
26 12000x1.86=
22320
|
22320+7600=
29920
|
2.67
|
79886 (or)
799006
|
1900
|
79900-
61900=18000
(lesser)
|
|||||||||
The entry pay or basic pay allowed
by G.O. On 7th Central Pay Comiision recommendation in respect of DRO cadre
officers is 29500 X2.67 = 78800
instead Rs.29S20 X 2.67 = Rs.79900
arrived at in column -7.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Note 1
|
The calculation for pay fixation for
serving govt servants is basic pay now being drawn X 2.57 as per the
illustrations to schedule V (pages 26-27)
of
go.
Ms, No. 303 Fin. (PC) Dept, Dated: 11.10.2017.
|
||||||||||||||||
Note 2
|
For pensioners the method of
caiculation is present basic pay X 2.57. for Deputy Cotiector the minimum
will be 21000 X 2.67 = 56100/2: 28050
instead-of Rs.10500/- (Present minimum) X 2.57 -26985fThe fixation at Rs. 28050/-is to maintain the minimum principle, corresponding to fixation as on 01.01.2006 with MF 2.67 up to p@ffoi.O1.2006 basic pay of Rs. 9650/- •
|
||||||||||||||||
Note 3
|
the minimum pay shown In cofumn 7 of
the above is followed, the pension for the pre- retirees # will be higher
|
||||||||||||||||
6) The promotional hierarchy varies (generalist category) from department to department as a result of which several officers are forced to retire with less promotion even after put in 30 / 35 years plus service in (Group-A/B) without reaching Super-Time Scale in whole of their career. On the other hand, their counterparts from the common entry succeed in getting early promotions well within 25 years to reach Super Time Scale. A Welfare Government should ensure that every section of officials and employees working in the government sector should have the satisfaction of getting his or her due in time, both in terms of promotion as well as in terms of pay benefits, without any real or perceived discrimination. A rough random analysis reveals that there are anomalies between erstwhile PB3 & PB4 posts in Tamil Nadu State, (In GOI the difference is much less as they have prescribed minimum service, higher educational qualification, Training, Tests etc. in each category to get promotion) In the case of IAS for Regular Recruit (RR) are initially appointed to Junior Time Scale (JTS), subsequently Senior Scale (SS), Junior Administrative Grade (JAG), Selection Grade (SG), Super Timescale (ST) HAG & Chief Secretary cadre (CS) respectively prescribing minimum service one has to put in each cadre. If we look at the Statement-1, in Tamil Nadu Secretariat many individuals reached erstwhile PB4 category of posts well within a short span of time from PB3 cadre while those who have rendered 30 or 35 years plus service could not reach PB4 and retired only as Section Officer, Under Secretary or Dy. Secretary thus depriving huge financial loss for no fault of theirs. A thorough in-depth study needed between Dy. Secretary, Joint Secretary & Additional Secretary Posts (Non-IAS) notionally from 1-1-2006, and Entry pay from 1-1-2016.
ReplyDelete